But the difference today," he chuckles, "is that for the first time machines are threatening the jobs of people with college degrees and Twitter accounts." And for hundreds, if not thousands, of years, this process was never questioned. From the very beginning, we came out with new concepts, new machines, new tools to help us to do repetitive tasks and concentrate on something more productive. "It's just a new step in the history of human progress. I think we're still at the stage where we're yet to define what AI is, and you have to start with the 'I' – intelligence."Ĭhess Grandmaster and writer Garry Kasparov speaks onstage during TechCrunch Disrupt NY 2017 - Day 3 at Pier 36 on in New York City.įor a man whose public battles with a machine were seen as a harbinger for a new era of computational prowess, he remains sanguine, insisting machines are not our enemies. "If you have 10 experts in the room and ask how they define AI, you may end up with 15 different answers. "I recommend being very careful using the word AI," he insists, in a gravelly Russian baritone. Who better to discuss AI with, than a man who was famously beaten by it? Alongside his political life, his unique relationship with machines – after two decades of reflection – has turned Kasparov into a poster boy for embracing the future. Since retiring from international chess in 2005, his life has been a perfect storm of human rights activism and anti-Putin polemic. Kasparov is in London with Avast, an information security firm for which he is ambassador, speaking at IP Expo.įorehead swollen and bandaged, the chess world champion of 15 years is three hours late for our interview due to an earlier car accident, but in good spirits, considering. Machine chess championship Februin New York City. If we were Kasparov we would get on the waiting list for a microchip implant pretty damned quickly.Chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov ponders a move during the final match against chess supercomputer Deep Junior in the the Man vs. This week’s meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science was given an awesome list of human parts that can be created by “tissue engineers” to replace anything from a pancreas to blood vessels. If the human race wants to fight back it may have to play Deep Blue at its own game: science. He argued that if a concealed computer was so adept at answering questions that from its responses alone you were unable to tell it apart from a human, that machine could be called “intelligent”.Įven if Kasparov does fight back it is only a matter of time before an unbeatable computer is devised. Deep Blue is now within sight of passing the test laid down by Alan Turing, the father of artificial intelligence. The sort of shortcut a grand master takes – instinctively avoiding irrelevant moves – a computer can do by being told not to explore avenues to which it has assigned low values. What Deep Blue is saying this week is that “intuition” is programmable: merely a question of more megabytes. Kasparov argues that though the latest machines can calculate billions of moves, they lack imagination.
This marks a milestone in the progress of artificial intelligence.
#Kasparov chess computers full#
Kasparov won the second game but the fact is the world’s greatest chess player has been beaten for the first time in a full -length game by the desiccated calculations of a sliver of silicon. We won’t hear that again because this week a hugely more powerful IBM Deep Blue beat Kasparov in the opening game of a challenge match coinciding with the 50th anniversary of the first electronic computer. When Garry Kasparov beat IBM’s chess computer in 1989 he told the programmers to “teach it to resign earlier”. Editorial: Mr Kasparov and the deep blues – the world’s greatest living chess player is beaten by IBM He left the Pennsylvania Convention Centre without speaking to reporters, and chess colleagues described him as devastated. He said at some points during the game, Deep Blue was analysing more than 100 million chess positions a second.Īt the end, Mr Kasparov reached across the board to shake hands with Feng-Hsiung Hsu, the IBM scientist who moved the pieces for Deep Blue.
#Kasparov chess computers software#
“We’ve got one of the greatest concentrations of computing power ever focused on a single problem working here,” said Joseph Hoane, who has worked on Deep Blue software for more than six years.